Tuesday, April 23, 2013

Citizen Twain - Reaction (and a Dream Come True)



So, for those of you who don't know. I'm the biggest Val Kilmer fan out there. I own his entire filmography on DVD.  Val Kilmer has been my hero since I was about 8 years old. I saw the Ghost and the Darkness and it became my favorite movie, and has remained a personal love. I watched him in Kiss Kiss Bang Bang, and the gag reel, and thought they looked like they were having so much fun, I had to try that out. And I did. I enrolled in an acting class and most of you know the rest. I've acted in over 15 shows the last 5 years. I've starred in several, and produced a couple that I'm very proud of. And I'm not even close to getting started. Acting changed my life. It allowed me to discover who I was as a person, gave my life direction, and finally allowed me to define my identity in a word: Actor. So thanks for that Val.

Anyway, he's been developing a film about Mark Twain and Mary Baker Eddy for the past decade, which he has written, will direct, and will star as Mark Twain. I've been following it for the past 3-4 years since the preview was put on Youtube.

It's been a long slow process. But the last year things have really picked up. Val was ready to make the movie, but realized he hadn't spent enough time developing Twain as an actor, since he'll be too busy directing to take actor breaks. Which  lead him to the conclusion that the only way to discover Twain is to do him on stage. Acting is a funny thing.

After a year of previews and workshops, Citizen Twain finally hit the road, and to my delight, the second stop was the not too distant city of Dallas. I scooped up my ticket, and one for my lady friend, and almost peed myself when the option for a VIP ticket, that came with a meet and greet with my all time hero Val Kilmer was presented. I of course purchased it.


I got to Dallas and the theatre was gorgeous. The Wyly is a really cool looking building, in a happening part of town. I walked the area and people-watched quite a bit (I was unsurprisingly early). Once inside I hit the merch table immediately. I purchased a photo for Val to sign, a tshirt with the poster on it, the poster for the show, and a short documentary that gave a little glimpse into the rehearsal process. Anything to watch Val working on the craft.

So the doors open and we're inside. The set is simple, the 3d mapping a cool touch, as starts whiz by. I'm in the third row. Not 10 feet away from the stage. Dead center. Perfect seats.



I'm waiting, thumbing through the program, the pronounces production of the film will commence once Val, "gets the dough." Should've saved that Red Planet paycheck. It's about 10 minutes until curtain, when I spot the creme colored suit out of the corner of my eye. Then the crazy white wig. It's VAL (Mark Twain). He comes out into the audience (a small black box that seats about 450 (says an usher) there is about 400 in attendance) and begins to mingle. Puffing on a cigar, sipping a fifth of whiskey, he proclaims that he's lost. Hobnobs about, toasting with excited guests. I could've grabbed his ass at one point. He's hurrying stragglers to their seats. I'm lit up like an xmas tree. Most of the audience hasn't even noticed, or don't recognize him.

He then hits the stage. There I am, watching Val Kilmer. Act. In front of my eyes. "I apologize if you're having trouble hearing me in the back," he croaks in a phlegm ridden Missouri twang, "I'm dead." The audience guffaws in unison. I'm sold.

What follows is a most interesting experiment written, directed, and performed by Val. It's somewhere between a stand up show, and a stream of consciousness monologue in which Twain cracks one liners about politics, cat food, and whiskey. He also provides commentary on god, slavery, death, and family. He reenacts scenes from Tom Sawyer and Huckleberry Finn as if they were anecdotes.

The premise being that Twain's ghost has been sent back by god (Twain's foot must be in his mouth upon that meeting) to apologize to Mary Baker Eddy and finish his autobiography. Eddy is the founder of Christian Science (Kilmer is a christian scientist) whom Twain was obsessed with, jealous of, and in a way akin to. He wrote a book about her. His worst. He called her a crook. And a genius.

Twain's autobiography set out to both tell Twain's story (as they tend to) and but also, Twain felt anything that popped into his head was him. So he included that too. Which allows some understanding into the structure and writing of the show. What could be seen as unfocused and damn near schizophrenic is actually an attempt to bring that style of writing to life.Viewed through that lens it is a success.

The first act of the show plays like a standup comic. The show uses something like 50% Twain's writing, and 50% Val. It's all interspersed and it's hard to tell where one ends and the other starts. The 3d mapping in the background provides laughs and visuals to accompany the story. It's a nice touch to give the whole thing some pop.

At one point Val accidentally spilled his whiskey where he needed to sit continuously through the show. Which was fun for me to see, because I could see his actor wheels turning on how to deal with the problem in character. Mopping up with prop newspapers, checking nonchalantly, all the things I did when I spilled a beer in "Tape." It's fun to see the gods you worship humanized before you, and see they do what you do. As an aspiring actor I was enthralled. He ended up pulling an audience member on stage.

The reenactments of the stories were fun, providing some pathos, and the feeling that you're listening to an uncle that can't do without an anecdote. The nature of the show allowed Val to break the fourth wall, and play with the audience, which was fun and intimate. And as the third act drew near, the show takes a somber turn, and was the biggest draw for me.

As Twain talks about god, the 3d mapping treats us to a Tree of Life-esque montage of stars, as Twain says god is too big for blasphemy, he is above it, or too small, and beneath it. Twain comes to the end of his life, where tragedy struck three-pence, with his daughter, wife, and youngest daughter all dying within a year. Twain died the next. He also never wrote following the Christmas eve passing of his youngest, who drowned in the bathtub of an epileptic seizure, Val's teenaged brother dying of the same cause in the pool (my brother and mother both battled epilepsy). All that's left to comfort Twain are the words, the humor. But he can't write anymore. Real humor is tragedy.

Needless to say Val was spectacular. Unrecognizable as Twain. He's still a theater actor, acting with his whole body. The shuffled walk, the gestures, the fine nuances in his face, as he puckered his lips as a tick, licked his lips like an older man. Not the finest hint of the man beneath. Accent never faltered. I was inspired and blown away to see the person I think is one of the greatest living actors do it, and from that close, and be that good. It was something I'll never forget.

Applause sounded. The show was over. I started the standing O. No way was he not going to get one. The crowd loved the show. Val stayed on to have his makeup removed and take questions. To see him transform back was truly remarkable. The questions were stuff that had mostly been answered before. I wanted to ask him the difference in preparation and feeling of stage vs film acting, but got looked over. A man said Twain was more of an atheist than Val's interpretation suggested. Not a stretch. Val countered that Twain was always searching for something. And Val didn't pull punches from religion in the show, but just the fact that god had sent him back was maybe too much for the fellow.

Makeup being removed.

But now it was time to meet him. I jumped into an elevator with about 30 other people and went up. We waited in line as Val got cleaned up. My hands were shaking. I chatted with a couple ahead of me. People were surprised by how much they liked the show. Val came in. He brushed by me. There he was. Him again. It was surreal. He's my height. I imagine meeting Tom Cruise is underwhelming with the height and all. He looked great. Reports of the 80 pound weight loss were true. He looked in a daze, tired, but cheery. A lot like I am post show. Coming out of character, trying to find yourself, exhausted.

I learned there was no professional photographer, as there had been at the LA show. What we had was all there was to take a picture. A phone in my case. I thanked the world's deities I hadn't killed the battery. The couple before me heard my plight, and offered to take pics with their camera for me as well. They have since sent them to me. Very kind gesture that I appreciated infinitely.

I finally made it to the front. I'd spent a week thinking about what I would say, what I settled on wasn't exactly revelatory, but appropriate I thought. I shook his hand (hands aren't as big as mine, weird the things you remember) and said hi. I gave him my photo for him to sign. To David I said. I told him that he was my hero, and that I'd become an actor because of him, and that watching him act was truly inspiring, and I'd hoped to do the next show I did as good as he was, and how amazing it was to see him act in real life, on stage, like I have. He said wow and thank you, and we posed for some pictures. There was a line, so that was all I got. As I walked away, I glanced back and caught a look from him, just the mischievous grin he wears, as we made eye contact, and I continued on. A brief, and as I describe it to someone else I realize not that amazing, but to me a dream come true. The whole affair, the night, the show, was something I'll never forget.

My next goal; to act with Val Kilmer. I want to be in that Mark Twain movie. I'll act for free. I'd act on stage with him. I'd pay to be an acting student. That'd be something....

Val says he'll be touring for the next 3 years, as that's how long it'll take to raise the money to finance the film. Here's to hoping I'll get to see it again. And if you get the chance so should you


Tuesday, April 9, 2013

Bang and Burn - 4/9


Interstellar goes Catshit Crazy

We're crying too...


Christopher Nolan has a habit of working with a small troop of actors, and that will likely continue as the cast of Interstellar, the Batman director's next feature, begins to take shape. Although, it is my solemn duty to report that instead of Tom Hardy, Cilian Murphy, Leo DiCaprio, Jo Gordon-Levitt, Ellen Page, Marion Cotillard, Liam Neeson, Gary Oldman, Michael Caine, Morgan Freeman, Hugh Jackman, Christian Bale, Scarlett Johansson, Heath Ledger (oops), Al Pacino, Robin Williams, or even MF'in Tom Berenger returning, we get Anne Hathaway, who is set to return and costar with Matthew McConnaughey in Interstellar. The worst part of Batman (yes worse than Katie Holmes) is back to be overrated some more. Nolan has always struggled to cast female parts well in my opinion, and he keeps that streak going.

Matt Damon's Bald Plugged in Head is Here to Kick Ass and Chew Bubble Gum

And all the bubble gum is on the moon

Despite the trailer revealing nothing but the fact that much ass will be kicked, Damon looks good with a bald head, Jodie Foster is still a cold witch, and Bloomkamp can film some bad A action, I'm still excited. I know this will have some searing political commentary, and after other films have failed to really provide decent commentary on our times, and be a good film simultaneously (I'm looking at you In Time) I have no doubt Bloomkamp will deliver.

Hercules is Like a Rock

Agent: "Yea Dwayne, Brett Ratner is directing"

Brett Ratner has found a star for his next craphole of a film, Hercules, which exactly nobody was asking for, since Kevin Sorbo isn't involved. No word if Xena will be joining the action (but god I hope she is). While we're all glad that Dwayne "Don't call me the Rock" Johnson is back to doing action instead of kids movies, well... actually, yea, this is probably exactly what we had in mind.

I Like My Coffee Black, with a hint of Chestnut

0 - The amount of people I take seriously named Chestnut

Morris Chestnut is being linked to the role of Black Panther, which Marvel decided not to include in Phase 2, because they're pretty sure 2 black people in the entire universe is enough. But reportedly, despite no solo film (despite being totally worthy of one) the Panther may appear in Avengers 2. Because that cast isn't big enough yet. I've been a vocal advocate of Dijmon Honsou, who is an Oscar nominated very capable actor, and actually African. Also has real screen presence, while Chestnut (that damned name) is a Tyler Perry veteran. Excuse me while I vomit.

Jane's Got a Gun... and if She Were Smart, She'd Use it on Herself

*whisper* "Are you sure the contract says I have to be in this? What if I choke to death on this food? I know it's soup dammit!"

The latest catastrophe in the Jane's Got a Gun saga is that Bradley Cooper has made the mistake of replacing Jude Law who replaced Michael Fassbender in the western starring Portman that was to be directed by We Need to Talk About Kevin's director Lynne Ramsay, who was replaced by Gavin O'Connor (Warrior) 4 days before production was to start. 

...and that's it, so here's this Val Kilmer fun to end your day

Wreck-It Ralph

Wreck-It Ralph

Grade: B


Despite owning Pixar, Disney just can't seem to replicate their genius. Wreck-It Ralph is as close as they've come, and it is arguably better than Pixar's Brave (which may be no coincidence that it is their first film Post Disney (re)take over). Ralph is enjoyable, but never manages to establish the undercurrent of real emotion and pathos that a Pixar film has going. Not to mention they squander a golden opportunity to really have fun with the video game setting, by only allowing Ralph into two games. I needed a montage of in jokes and pop culture video game references. Seriously.

Ralph is an unappreciated villain of his video game that has been operated in the arcade for some thirty years. The setup is very similar to Toy Story, in that once the kids leave, the games come alive and have lives of their own. However, no kid laid in bed thinking that the games played without him like they do about toys. Ralph sets out to prove he's more than just a bad guy, after the highlight of the film that is the opening scene, which is Ralph at a bad guy support group. All the characters and their interaction, as well as the inside jokes about their behavior was a gift to a geek. Then they mostly dropped it.

The film is funny, in a weird way that it blends the over joking of the Will Ferrell brand of comedy (Ralph is voiced by Ferrell vet Reilly) and the traditional kids Disney humor. It can sometimes be a little awkward when it doesn't gel. Needless to say, things get complicated and Ralph's journey from just pretending to do a good thing, to actually doing one is solidified. And Ralph is a great character, if a little ape-ish.

But it's just not up to snuff with what my expectations are from being spoiled by Pixar. If I hadn't known who made it, I would've been able to tell you that it was a Disney or Dreamworks project. It is definitely a step in the right direction, and considering Ralph 2 is supposedly featuring a team up with Super Mario, all my dreams may come true. 

One Shot - Mean Creek, Newton Boys

Mean Creek

Grade: B+


A thoughtful, character focused examination of bullying and the consequences of revenge. This folly of youth tale centers around a young boy and his friends, who take a school bully out on a boating trip to play a practical joke on him. When it backfires and is accidentally killed, they are forced to grow up in ways they never expected. An honest look at being a teenager, respectfully written and well acted.

Newton Boys

Grade: C+

A misfire in the career of Linklater, who takes a high stakes dramatic genre in bank robbing cum westerns, and turns it into a breezy lark. No real center or POV is established, and it just moseys along with no real drama or interest. The characters are charming and well acted by a game cast, but Linklater can't stray far enough from his roots. This would've been much better in a more suited directors hands (paging Michael Mann).

Sunday, April 7, 2013

One Shot - Little Birds, Loneliest Planet, Jack and Diane, Man with the Iron Fists

Little Birds

Grade: C

A coming of age tale featuring two young girls from the Salton Sea, who journey to LA, and get caught up with some no-good young boys who get in over their heads with crime and cons. Juno Temple continues to do any indie movie that comes her way, and proves to be effective as the devil-may-care half, while her best friend is still young. It's a little boring at times, and takes too long to get anywhere, but it has it's moments.

Loneliest Planet

Grade: F

An exhaustingly minimalistic mediation on nature and the nature of people in relationships. Hardly stopping to develop a character, and when it does they aren't likable, or develop a story, and recycling the same monotonous landscapes and banal pointless dialogue. Avoid.

Jack and Diane

Grade: C-

Juno Temple strikes again (again) in another indie flick, this time a summer romance between two girls (titular characters). This time Temple is the bubbly and naive Diane, while Jack is the clingy hard-ass (oxymoron?). This is also very slow, and tries to mix in this very awkward horror element, for no reason that some film-school level thesis of love being a monster. Or Diane is a werewolf. I don't know.

Man with the Iron Fists

Grade: C-

I usually would write a longer review for a film like this, but I can't think of much nice to say. I love the RZA, and his tutelage under Tarantino and Jarmusch has definitely given him an eye for good shots, and a taste for a floating camera. But his writing (hackneyed) and the editing (first cut was 4.5 hours now 114 minutes) really undermine anything good going on. With a terrible voiceover that amounts to "and then this happened" and "but you thought that was bad, aw naw son" and fight scenes that play like sportscenter highlight reels in which you have no physical idea of what is going on, not to mention poor CGI (that is overused) and you just have a trainwreck of a film. A shame.



Stoker

Stoker

Grade: B+

Directed by: Chan Wook-Park

Starring: Mia Wasikowska, Nicole Kidman, Matthew Goode


Chan Wook-Park arrives with his English directorial debut and make no mistake, this is his movie. That's not to say that the actors aren't good (they are) or the story isn't solid (it's effectively creepy, if a little predictable) but it's his directorial flourishes and borderline showboating that delivers, and almost upends at times, the film. It's interesting that his first english language film would be a gothic tale, a very western hemisphere type of story. If anything, he proves beyond a shadow of a doubt, that he belongs making films on this side of the pond.

Stoker opens fittingly, with a funeral. We see a dark, morbid sort of girl, the kind that Twilight has hijacked and turned into a mushy mess. Wasikowska proves to be a far superior ("surprise!" thought no one) actress that Stewart in this type of role. We see India (Wasikowska) looking distant, her grieving mother (Kidman) and in the distance, a figure, watching. We hear him say hello to India. Who is he? Why is he at India's funeral? He is Uncle Charlie (Goode) and has returned for the funeral after some 20 years abroad. He is magnetic. Sophisticated, good-looking, and charming, nobody can believe he's there. He's actually going to be staying for a while. He seems particularly keen to get to know India, who seems instinctively afraid of him. 

India's mother is all too ready to welcome him, to warm their home, to take her mind off her very cold relationship with her daughter. But all the while, it seems that Charlie has his eyes on India. We follow India to school, where to no surprise she is not exactly popular. But she's no victim either. When a bullying male goes to strike her, she stabs him in the hand with a pencil. She's got a mean streak. The film excels at building these characters and situations, while still maintaining a healthy amount of mystery and intrigue. And as events unfold, and secrets are revealed seemingly much too soon (poor Auntie Gwen never stood a chance), there is still more to come. While this could be too much under a lesser director, Park has a tight grip on the pacing and mood of his film. He won't let there be a lull, even when you perceive there should be one. He keeps tightening the screws.

He allows himself this control by tapping into India's apparent super senses. She can hear, see, and feel the slightest nuances. We hear the squeak and creak of a belt around someone's waist as they move. Whispers under breath. The squish of blood mixed with wood from sharpening a bloody pencil. This hyper-awareness is a bond between her and Charlie, who says he is the same way, and always knew that she would be too. They are meant to know each other. Their relationship grows very strange as Evelyn seems to be falling for Charlie's wiles, but what are his motivations. As he watches India as he caresses her mother, things get complicated. Add in India masturbating in the shower to a murder that happens in the film, and you've got yourself an effectively fucked up gothic tale, that takes the conventions further than they were meant to go.

Wasikowska shines in a difficult role of being cold, innocent, vulnerable, dark, curious, and then dangerous in a turn that feels that way, instead of something that we were just waiting to happen, which would've been the case if too dark of an actress took the role. Kidman is conniving and breathy, and Goode is solid as Charlie, although I didn't see enough of a difference once the character's true nature is revealed. They are all effectively understated, otherwise the film would've collapsed in on itself.

It's not very often we get these Bronte-ish (Wasikowska was also very good in the newest Jane Eyre) dark castle films, featuring a messed up family, and some creepy goings on. Even less frequent that they are done well, and build upon the genre, rather than letting modern trappings undermine the very point of the stories. While the end isn't necessarily where I thought things needed to end up, it's not enough to take away from a stylish film, made by the hand of a craftsman.

Fun fact: Carey Mulligan and Jodie Foster and Colin Firth were originally cast, but were replaced by Wasikowska and Kidman and Goode. A host of young actresses including Kristen Stewart and Rooney mara were considered. As was James Franco and Michael Fassbender.

Sinister

Sinister

Grade: B-

Directed by: Scott Derrickson

Starring: Ethan Hawke


From the makers of the better-than-expected Insidious comes Sinister, another better-than-most scary movie, that while not truly traumatizing or revelatory, is a welcome addition to the much maligned state of modern horror. This follows the same setup as Insidious and relies more on suspense and mood, rather than gore and shock (currently in vogue (e.g. Evil Dead, Saw)). Adding a solid thespian front and center (Hawke, in his first foray into the genre) helps ground the picture and get it away from teeny bopper slasher mode.

Hawke plays a true crime writer, whose first book was a landmark success. And he's been struggling to match that genius since. He moves his family to a new town, because he can't take being a teacher and editing textbooks anymore. He's not exactly a likable character, as it is revealed that he's mostly doing this for the money and fame. He yearns to be lusted after again, and is willing to put his family's safety at risk to do so. Hawke succeeds at playing the prideful and headstrong author, who is also manipulative and a heavy drinker. His wife seems to do nothing but create conflict when it's needed, and the kids are there to up the ante. Needless to say, this particular crime is bigger and scarier than he could've imagined.

The local coppers aren't too kind to hear of the author rolling into town and basically saying they didn't do their job, which supplies some early ominous feelings. And while moving to the town to do research is why they have come to town, let's just say the research hits a little closer to home. Then he finds a box of old "home movies" upstairs. They have cutesy titles like "Pool Party" but upon viewing the harmless title actually reveals itself to be about this child dropping his family into a pool and watching them drown, as they squirm helplessly tied to fold-out sunbathing chairs. Hawke smells gold mine. This is his ticket to the big time. Never mind that creepy stuff happens every time he watches them, and that he is in fact watching them repeatedly.

Things take a turn for the supernatural, and a local prof is brought in to clear things up (lazy writer device) in the Skyping D'Onofrio, who apparently had nothing better to do besides be bearded and sort of eccentric. Extra points for having the gall to give such an ugly ending, although the crazy bits and the true crime nature feel a little at odds to me. It's what a scary movie should be, a little unnerving, ominous, moody, and out there.